The Composite Sufi Front vis-à-vis the Puritanical Kadızadeli Movement in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8033544Keywords:
Ottoman Empire, Kadızadeli Movement, Sufism, Illicit Innovation (bid‘a), sharia, Heterogeneity, Mevlevîs, MesnevīAbstract
The seventeenth-century Ottoman society experienced a major split due to the reformist and anti-traditionalist Kadızadeli movement. Their puritanical vision germane to Islam was in direct contradiction to the more inclusive and latitudinarian religious reception of the Sufi orders. The radicalism of the Kadızadeli adherents managed to resonate in the imperial court and provoked the enforcement of several anti-Sufi measures such as the prohibition of the whirling (semāʻ) ritual peculiar to the Mevlevîs. The particularities of this wide-ranging movement have already been meticulously studied through the prism of historically specific socio-economic relations; however, little attention has been given to the agency and inventiveness of the Sufis in reaction to the Kadızadeli incursions. The present article aims to rectify this omission in the literature. Primarily, the lines of cleavage separating the two opposite groups were not clearly demarcated but blurred. Further, the Sufis were not thoroughly glued to one another through the presence of a well-organized, coherent, and uniform coterie. Rather, the Sufi populace was expressive of a remarkably fragmented structure due to the intra-Sufi discords. Whilst excommunicating each other, they could go so far as to develop reflexes as extremist as a Kadızadeli sympathizer. Nevertheless, the only device through which they advocated institutionalized mystical practices was their pen.
References
Primary Sources
Abdülganî en-Nablusî. Mevlevîlik Müdafaası. Translated by M. Zahid Tığlıoğlu. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2019.
Abdülganî en-Nablusî. Tütün Risalesi. Translated by M. Emin Efe and Ahmet Şenharputlu. İstanbul: Dergâh, 2021.
Katib Çelebi. The Balance of Truth. Translated by G. Lewis. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1957.
Katib Çelebi. Fezleke-i Tarih. vol. 2. İstanbul, 1286 [1870].
Mustafa Naima. Tarih-i Naima. vol. 6. İstanbul, 1282 [1865-66].
Niyazî-i Mısrî. Niyâzî-i Mısrî Divanı. Prepared by Kenan Erdoğan. Ankara: Akçağ, 1998.
Niyazî-i Mısrî. Niyazî-i Mısrî’nin Hatıraları. Prepared by Halil Çeçen. İstanbul: Dergâh, 2006.
Secondary Sources
Allen, Jonathan Parkes. “Reading Mehmed Birgivî with ‘Abd al-Ghanī al-Nābulusī, Contested Interpretations of Birgivî’s al-Tarīqa al-Muhammadiyya in the 17th-18th-Century Ottoman Empire.” In Early Modern Trends in Islamic Theology, edited by Lejla Demiri and Samuela Pagani, 153-170. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
Alvan, Türkan. Sultan Murad-ı Sâlis’in Dünyası. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2021.
Ambrosio, Alberto F. Dervişler. Translated by Buğra Poyraz. İstanbul: Kabalcı, 2012.
Ambrosio, Alberto F. “Ismā‘īl Rusūhī Ankaravī: An Early Mevlevi intervention into the emerging Kadızadeli Sufi conflict.” In Sufism and Society: Arrangements of the Mystical in the Muslim World, 1200-1800, edited by John Curry and Erik Ohlander, 183-197. Florence: Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
Baer, Marc David. Honored by the Glory of Islam: Conversion and Conquest in Ottoman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Bilkan, Ali Fuat. Fakihler ve Sofuların Kavgası: 17. Yüzyılda Kadızadeliler ve Sivasiler. İstanbul: İletişim, 2016.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. “The Myth of ‘the Triumph of Fanaticism’ in the Seventeenth-Century Ottoman Empire.” Die Welt des Islams 48, (2008): 196-221.
Gölpınarlı, Abdülbâki. Mevlânâ’dan Sonra Mevlevilik. İstanbul: İnkılap, 2018.
Gürbüzel, Aslıhan. “Bilingual Heaven: Was there a Distinct Persianate Islam in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire?” Philological Encounters 6, (2021): 214-241.
Izutsu, Toshihiko. Creation and the Timeless Order of Things. Ashland: White Cloud Press, 1994.
İnalcık, Halil. Devlet-i ‘Aliyye, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Üzerine Araştırmalar 2. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası, 2014.
Kafadar, Cemal. “The Question of Ottoman Decline.” Harvard Middle Eastern and Islamic Review 4, (1997-1998): 30-75.
Kara, Mustafa. Din, Hayat, Sanat Açısından Tekkeler ve Zaviyeler. İstanbul: Dergâh, 2019.
Kara, Mustafa. “Hikmet: Tasavvuf.” TDVIA. vol. 17. İstanbul: TDV, 1998.
Kara, Mustafa. Metinlerle Osmanlılarda Tasavvuf ve Tarikatlar. İstanbul: Dergâh, 2021.
Lekesiz, Mustafa Hulusi. “XVI. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Düzenindeki Değişimin Tasfiyeci (Püritanist) Bir Eleştirisi: Birgivî Mehmed Efendi ve Fikirleri.” PhD diss. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, 1997.
Ocak, Ahmet Yaşar. Yeniçağlar Anadolu’sunda İslam’ın Ayak İzleri: Osmanlı Dönemi, Makaleler Araştırmalar. İstanbul: Kitap Yayınları, 2011.
Öztürk, Necati. “Islamic Orthodoxy among the Ottomans in the Seventeenth Century with Special Reference to the Qadizadeh Movement.” PhD diss. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 1981.
Pagani, Samuela. “Timeless Typologies and New Individualities, ‘Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulusi, Niyâzî-i Mısrî and the Sufi Theory of Sainthood in the Early Modern Ottoman World.” In Early Modern Trends in Islamic Theology, edited by Lejla Demiri and Samuela Pagani, 171-194. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.
Sariyannis, Marinos. “The Kadızadeli Movement as a Social and Political Phenomenon: The Rise of a ‘Mercantile Ethic’?” In Political Initiatives ‘from the Bottom up’ in the Ottoman Empire, Halcyon Days in Crete VII, 9-11 Jan. 2009, edited by A. Anastasopoulos, 263-289. Rethymno: Crete University Press, 2012.
Tasbihi, Eliza. “Sufis Versus Exoteric Ulama in Seventeenth-century Ottoman Turkey: The Debate on ‘Pharaoh’s Faith’ in the Mevlevī and Akbarian Sufi Traditions.” In Sufis and Their Opponents in the Persianate World, edited by Reza Tabandeh and Leonard Lewisohn, 167-203. Irvine: Jordan Center for Persian Studies, 2020.
Tasbihi, Eliza. “The Mevlevī Sufı Shaykh Ismāʻīl Rusūkhī Anqarawī (d. 1631) and his Commentary on Rūmī’s Mathnawī,” Mawlana Rumi Review, no. 6 (2015): 163-182.
Terzioğlu, Derin. “Ibn Taymiyya, al-Siyāsa al-Sharʻiyya, and the Early Modern Ottoman.” In Historicizing Sunni Islam in the Ottoman Empire, c. 1450-c. 1750, edited by Tijana Krstić and Derin Terzioğlu, 101-154. Leiden: Brill, 2021.
Terzioğlu, Derin. “Man in the Image of God in the Image of the Times: Sufi Self Narratives and the Diary of Niyāzī-i Mıṣrī (1618-94),” Studia Islamica, no. 94 (2002): 139-165.
Terzioğlu, Derin. “Sufi and Dissident in the Ottoman Empire: Niyāzī-i Mıṣrī.” PhD diss. Harvard University, Cambridge, 1999.
Tezcan, Baki. “The Portrait of the Preacher as a Young Man: Two Autobiographical Letters by Kadızade Mehmed from the Early Seventeenth Century.” In Political Thought and Practice in the Ottoman Empire: Halcyon Days in Crete IX – A Symposium Held in Rethymno, 9-11 January 2015, edited by Marinos Sariyannis, 187-249. Rethymno: Crete University Press, 2019.
Trimingham, John Spencer. The Sufi Orders in Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.
Zilfi, Madeline. Politics of Piety: The Ottoman Ulama in the Post-classical Age: 1600-1800. Minneapolis: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1988.
Zilfi, Madeline. “The Kadızadelis: Discordant Revivalism in Seventeenth-Century Istanbul.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 45, no. 4 (October 1986): 251-169.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Zemin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.